Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple A14 Bionic

We’ve conducted a comprehensive side-by-side comparison between the latest Exynos 2200 and A14 Bionic SoCs, from Samsung and Apple respectively. Our analysis delves into the performance of these 8-core and 6-core processors, based on Geekbench, Antutu, and 3DMark benchmark results, providing detailed technical comparisons.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators

CPU Performance

Evaluation of Single-Core and Multi-Core Processor Performance

Exynos 2200

A14 Bionic

Gaming Performance

Gaming and OpenCL/Vulkan Performance of the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)

Exynos 2200

A14 Bionic

Battery life

Energy Efficiency in Battery Usage

Exynos 2200

A14 Bionic

Tech Insist Score

Overall Performance Rating of the Chip

Exynos 2200

A14 Bionic

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip

Pros of Exynos 2200

Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than A14 Bionic (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
Exynos 2200 has 20.00% smaller sized transistor than A14 Bionic (4 vs 5 nm).
Exynos 2200 has 25.78 % better AnTuTu 9 score than A14 Bionic (945 K vs 751 K).
Exynos 2200 has the latest instruction set, hence better than A14 Bionic.
Exynos 2200 supports 50.15 % higher memory bandwidth than A14 Bionic ( 51.2 vs 34.1 MHz).

Pros of A14 Bionic

A14 Bionic has 10.71 % higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 ( 3100 vs 2800 MHz).

Benchmarks

Evaluating performance through competitive testing in leading benchmarks.

SoC:

Exynos 2200

A14 Bionic

AnTuTu 10

The AnTuTu Benchmark evaluates CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O capabilities across various scenarios.

Exynos 2200 +9%

944505

A14 Bionic

750935

CPU	223163	203493
GPU	391575	284242
Memory	175188	131989
UX	154579	131211
Total score	944505	750935

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance

Single-Core Score

Exynos 2200

1164

A14 Bionic +15%

1611

Multi-Core Score

Exynos 2200

3570

A14 Bionic +8%

4209

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)

3DMark Wild Life Performance

Exynos 2200

6531

A14 Bionic +10%

8375

Stability	59%	77%
Graphics test	39 FPS	50 FPS
Score	6531	8375

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 9300

CPU

Architecture	1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510	2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm 4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores	8	6
Base Frequency	1820MHz	1800MHz
Turbo Frequency	2800MHz	3100MHz
Instruction set	ARMv9-A	ARMv8.5-A
L2 cache	-	128 KB
L2 cache	-	8 MB
L3 cache	-	-
Process	4 nanometers	5 nanometers
Transistor count	-	11.8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit)	-	6 W

Graphics

GPU name	Samsung Xclipse 920	Apple A14 GPU
Architecture	RDNA 2	-
GPU frequency	1300 MHz	-
Pipelines	24	4
Shading units	384	-
Total shaders	768	-
FLOPS	-	998 Gigaflops
Vulkan version	1.1	-
OpenCL version	2.0	-
DirectX version	12	-

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU)

Yes

Neural Engine

Memory

Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR4X
Memory frequency	3200 MHz	2133 MHz
Bus	-	-
Max bandwidth	51.2 Gbit/s	34.1 Gbit/s
Max size	24 GB	6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type	UFS 3.1	NVMe
Max display resolution	3840 x 2160	2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution	1x 200MP	-
Video capture	8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS	4K at 60FPS
Video playback	8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS	4K at 60FPS
Video codecs	H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9	H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
Audio codecs	AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV	AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+

Connectivity

Modem	-	-
4G support	LTE Cat. 24	LTE Cat. 18
5G support	Yes	Yes
Download speed 5G	Up to 7526 Mbps	Up to 7500 Mbps
Download speed 4G	Up to 3000 Mbps	-
Upload speed 5G	Up to 3758 Mbps	Up to 2500 Mbps
Upload speed 4G	Up to 422 Mbps	-
Wi-Fi	6	6
Bluetooth	5.2	5.0
Navigation	GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC	GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced	January 2022	September 2020
Class	Flagship	Flagship
Model number	S5E9925	APL1W01
Official page	Exynos 2200 official site	A14 Bionic official site