Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Hisilicon Kirin 970
We have compiled a detailed comparison of the recently introduced
Exynos 2200 vs Kirin 970
SoCs, designed by
Samsung and Hisilicon respectively. Our comparison outlines the benefits and
limitations of these
8-core
processors, focusing on
their performance across
Geekbench, Antutu, and
3DMark benchmarks, and
technical aspects.
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption,
and other
indicators
CPU Performance
Evaluation of Single-Core and
Multi-Core Processor Performance
Gaming Performance
Gaming and OpenCL/Vulkan
Performance of the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)
Battery life
Energy Efficiency in Battery Usage
Tech Insist Score
Overall Performance Rating of the
Chip
Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Exynos 2200
Exynos 2200 has
18.64%
higher CPU clock speed than
Kirin 970 (2800 vs 2360 MHz).
Exynos 2200 has
71.49%
higher memory frequency than
Kirin 970 (3200
vs 1866 MHz).
Exynos 2200
has
221.28
%
better AnTuTu 9
score than
Kirin 970 (945 K vs
294
K).
Exynos 2200 has the
latest
instruction
set, hence
better than
Kirin 970.
Exynos 2200
supports
71.81
%
higher
memory
bandwidth
than
Kirin 970
(
51.2
vs
29.8
MHz).
Exynos 2200
supports
150.00
%
higher
download
speed
than
Kirin 970
(
3000
vs
1200
Mbps).
Pros of Kirin 970
Kirin 970
has
-34.62
%
higher
GPU
clock
speed
than
Exynos 2200
(
850
vs
1300
MHz).
Kirin 970
has
150.00
%
smaller
sized
transistor
than
Exynos 2200
(
10
vs
4
nm).
Benchmarks
Evaluating performance through competitive testing in
leading benchmarks.
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark evaluates CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O
capabilities across various scenarios.
CPU
223163
77046
GPU
391575
90560
Memory
175188
66398
UX
154579
59977
Total score
944505
293981
GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and
multithreaded CPU
performance
3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics
performance in Vulkan
(Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Stability
59%
80%
Graphics test
39 FPS
6 FPS
Score
6531
1050
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity
9300
Architecture
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510
4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex A73 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex A53
Cores
8
8
Base Frequency
1820MHz
1840MHz
Turbo Frequency
2800MHz
2360MHz
Instruction set
ARMv9-A
ARMv8-A
L2 cache
-
-
L2 cache
-
0.5 MB
L3 cache
-
2 MB
Process
4 nanometers
10 nanometers
Transistor count
-
5.5 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit)
-
9 W
GPU name
Samsung Xclipse 920
Mali G72 MP12
Architecture
RDNA 2
Bifrost
GPU frequency
1300 MHz
850 MHz
Pipelines
24
12
Shading units
384
192
Total shaders
768
384
FLOPS
-
347 Gigaflops
Vulkan version
1.1
1.0
OpenCL version
2.0
2.0
DirectX version
12
12
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
Dedicated NPU
Memory type
LPDDR5
LPDDR4X
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
1866 MHz
Bus
-
-
Max bandwidth
51.2 Gbit/s
29.8 Gbit/s
Max size
24 GB
8 GB
Storage type
UFS 3.1
UFS 2.1
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution
1x 200MP
1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS
4K at 60FPS
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, VC-1
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
32 bit@384 kHz, HD-audio
Modem
-
-
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
LTE Cat. 18
5G support
Yes
No
Download speed 5G
Up to 7526 Mbps
-
Download speed 4G
Up to 3000 Mbps
Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed 5G
Up to 3758 Mbps
-
Upload speed 4G
Up to 422 Mbps
Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi
6
5
Bluetooth
5.2
4.2
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo