Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Mediatek Dimensity 720
We’ve put together a comprehensive comparison of the newly released Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 720 SoCs, brought to you by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. This analysis breaks down the pros and cons of these 8-core CPUs, evaluated through their Geekbench, Antutu, and 3DMark scores, along with their technical details.
Review
CPU Performance
Evaluation of Single-Core and
Multi-Core Processor Performance
Gaming Performance
Gaming and OpenCL/Vulkan
Performance of the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)
Battery life
Energy Efficiency in Battery Usage
Tech Insist Score
Overall Performance Rating of the
Chip
Key Differences
Pros of Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 40.00% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 720 (2800 vs 2000 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 720 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 42.86% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 720 (4 vs 7 nm).
- Exynos 2200 has 221.02 % better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 720 (945 K vs 294 K).
- Exynos 2200 has the latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 720.
- Exynos 2200 supports 199.94 % higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 720 ( 51.2 vs 17.07 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 supports 150.00 % higher download speed than Dimensity 720 ( 3000 vs 1200 Mbps).
Pros of Dimensity 720
- Dimensity 720 has -34.62 % higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 ( 850 vs 1300 MHz).
Benchmarks
Evaluating performance through competitive testing in leading benchmarks.AnTuTu 10
| CPU | 223163 | 94857 |
| GPU | 391575 | 73751 |
| Memory | 175188 | 64277 |
| UX | 154579 | 61339 |
| Total score | 944505 | 294224 |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 59% | 97% |
| Graphics test | 39 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Score | 6531 | 1219 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 9300CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1820MHz | 2000MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2800MHz | 2000MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | - |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 10 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Pipelines | 24 | 3 |
| Shading units | 384 | 48 |
| Total shaders | 768 | 96 |
| FLOPS | - | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | - | - |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 17.07 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 20MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed 5G | Up to 7526 Mbps | Up to 2770 Mbps |
| Download speed 4G | Up to 3000 Mbps | Up to 1200 Mbps |
| Upload speed 5G | Up to 3758 Mbps | - |
| Upload speed 4G | Up to 422 Mbps | Up to 211 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
Info
| Announced | January 2022 | July 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | S5E9925 | MT6853V |
| Official page | Exynos 2200 official site | Dimensity 720 official site |