Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
We’ve created an extensive comparison of the latest Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 810 SoCs, manufactured by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We’ve assessed the strengths and weaknesses of these 8-core processors based on Geekbench, Antutu, and 3DMark results, along with a detailed look at their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Evaluation of Single-Core and
Multi-Core Processor Performance
Gaming Performance
Gaming and OpenCL/Vulkan
Performance of the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)
Battery life
Energy Efficiency in Battery Usage
Tech Insist Score
Overall Performance Rating of the
Chip
Key Differences
Pros of Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 16.67% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (2800 vs 2400 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 810 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 810 (4 vs 6 nm).
- Exynos 2200 has 147.56 % better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 810 (945 K vs 382 K).
- Exynos 2200 has the latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 810.
- Exynos 2200 supports 199.94 % higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 810 ( 51.2 vs 17.07 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 supports 150.00 % higher download speed than Dimensity 810 ( 3000 vs 1200 Mbps).
Pros of Dimensity 810
- Dimensity 810 has -34.62 % higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 ( 850 vs 1300 MHz).
Benchmarks
Evaluating performance through competitive testing in leading benchmarks.AnTuTu 10
| CPU | 223163 | 113696 |
| GPU | 391575 | 85477 |
| Memory | 175188 | 76385 |
| UX | 154579 | 105966 |
| Total score | 944505 | 381524 |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 59% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 39 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Score | 6531 | 1232 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 9300CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1820MHz | 2000MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2800MHz | 2400MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | - | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 2 MB |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | 12 billion |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 8 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Pipelines | 24 | 2 |
| Shading units | 384 | 32 |
| Total shaders | 768 | 64 |
| FLOPS | - | - |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 3.0 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | - | - |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 17.07 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed 5G | Up to 7526 Mbps | Up to 2770 Mbps |
| Download speed 4G | Up to 3000 Mbps | Up to 1200 Mbps |
| Upload speed 5G | Up to 3758 Mbps | Up to 1250 Mbps |
| Upload speed 4G | Up to 422 Mbps | Up to 200 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | January 2022 | August 2021 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Model number | S5E9925 | MT6833V |
| Official page | Exynos 2200 official site | Dimensity 810 official site |