Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Helio G85
We’ve prepared an in-depth comparison between the newly launched Exynos 2200 and Helio G85 SoCs, developed by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. We’ve evaluated the pros and cons of these 8-core processors based on Geekbench, Antutu, and 3DMark benchmark scores alongside their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Evaluation of Single-Core and
Multi-Core Processor Performance
Gaming Performance
Gaming and OpenCL/Vulkan
Performance of the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)
Battery life
Energy Efficiency in Battery Usage
Tech Insist Score
Overall Performance Rating of the
Chip
Key Differences
Pros of Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 40.00% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G85 (2800 vs 2000 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 30.00% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G85 (1300 vs 1000 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 77.78% higher memory frequency than Helio G85 (3200 vs 1800 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 279.66 % better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G85 (945 K vs 249 K).
- Exynos 2200 has the latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G85.
- Exynos 2200 supports 281.80 % higher memory bandwidth than Helio G85 ( 51.2 vs 13.41 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 supports 900.00 % higher download speed than Helio G85 ( 3000 vs 300 Mbps).
Pros of Helio G85
- Helio G85 has 200.00 % smaller sized transistor than Exynos 2200 ( 12 vs 4 nm).
Benchmarks
Evaluating performance through competitive testing in leading benchmarks.AnTuTu 10
| CPU | 223163 | 67123 |
| GPU | 391575 | 61260 |
| Memory | 175188 | 42828 |
| UX | 154579 | 77565 |
| Total score | 944505 | 248776 |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 59% | - |
| Graphics test | 39 FPS | 4 FPS |
| Score | 6531 | 710 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 9300CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1820MHz | 1800MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2800MHz | 2000MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | - |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Bifrost 2 |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 24 | 2 |
| Shading units | 384 | 32 |
| Total shaders | 768 | 64 |
| FLOPS | - | 59 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Neural Engine |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | - | - |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Download speed 5G | Up to 7526 Mbps | - |
| Download speed 4G | Up to 3000 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed 5G | Up to 3758 Mbps | - |
| Upload speed 4G | Up to 422 Mbps | Up to 100 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | January 2022 | April 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | S5E9925 | MT6769Z |
| Official page | Exynos 2200 official site | Helio G85 official site |