Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Mediatek Helio G95
We’ve thoroughly compared the latest Exynos 2200 vs Helio G95 SoCs, developed by Samsung and Mediatek respectively. Our analysis covers the strengths and weaknesses of these 8-core CPUs, evaluated through their Geekbench, Antutu, and 3DMark scores and other key specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Evaluation of Single-Core and
Multi-Core Processor Performance
Gaming Performance
Gaming and OpenCL/Vulkan
Performance of the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)
Battery life
Energy Efficiency in Battery Usage
Tech Insist Score
Overall Performance Rating of the
Chip
Key Differences
Pros of Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 36.59% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (2800 vs 2050 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Helio G95 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 214.07 % better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (945 K vs 301 K).
- Exynos 2200 has the latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G95.
- Exynos 2200 supports Infinity % higher memory bandwidth than Helio G95 ( 51.2 vs MHz).
Pros of Helio G95
- Helio G95 has -30.77 % higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 ( 900 vs 1300 MHz).
- Helio G95 has 200.00 % smaller sized transistor than Exynos 2200 ( 12 vs 4 nm).
Benchmarks
Evaluating performance through competitive testing in leading benchmarks.AnTuTu 10
| CPU | 223163 | 91718 |
| GPU | 391575 | 91234 |
| Memory | 175188 | 58340 |
| UX | 154579 | 59442 |
| Total score | 944505 | 300734 |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 59% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 39 FPS | 8 FPS |
| Score | 6531 | 1464 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 9300CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1820MHz | 2000MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2800MHz | 2050MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L3 cache | - | - |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Pipelines | 24 | 4 |
| Shading units | 384 | 64 |
| Total shaders | 768 | 128 |
| FLOPS | - | 195.8 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Da Vinci |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | - | - |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | - |
| Max size | 24 GB | 10 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Download speed 5G | Up to 7526 Mbps | - |
| Download speed 4G | Up to 3000 Mbps | Up to 600 Mbps |
| Upload speed 5G | Up to 3758 Mbps | - |
| Upload speed 4G | Up to 422 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced | January 2022 | September 2020 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | S5E9925 | MT6785V/CD |
| Official page | Exynos 2200 official site | Helio G95 official site |