Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
We’ve thoroughly compared the latest Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 778g SoCs, developed by Samsung and Qualcomm respectively. Our analysis covers the strengths and weaknesses of these 8-core CPUs, evaluated through their Geekbench, Antutu, and 3DMark scores and other key specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Evaluation of Single-Core and
Multi-Core Processor Performance
Gaming Performance
Gaming and OpenCL/Vulkan
Performance of the Graphics Processing Unit (GPU)
Battery life
Energy Efficiency in Battery Usage
Tech Insist Score
Overall Performance Rating of the
Chip
Key Differences
Pros of Exynos 2200
- Exynos 2200 has 16.67% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778g (2800 vs 2400 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Snapdragon 778g (4 vs 6 nm).
- Exynos 2200 has 74.76 % better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 778g (945 K vs 540 K).
- Exynos 2200 has the latest instruction set, hence better than Snapdragon 778g.
- Exynos 2200 supports 100.00 % higher memory bandwidth than Snapdragon 778g ( 51.2 vs 25.6 MHz).
- Exynos 2200 supports 150.00 % higher download speed than Snapdragon 778g ( 3000 vs 1200 Mbps).
Pros of Snapdragon 778g
- Snapdragon 778g has -62.31 % higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 2200 ( 490 vs 1300 MHz).
Benchmarks
Evaluating performance through competitive testing in leading benchmarks.AnTuTu 10
| CPU | 223163 | 161744 |
| GPU | 391575 | 156423 |
| Memory | 175188 | 90737 |
| UX | 154579 | 131554 |
| Total score | 944505 | 540458 |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
3DMark
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 59% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 39 FPS | 14 FPS |
| Score | 6531 | 2468 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Dimensity 9300CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2 3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710 4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) 4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 1820MHz | 1900MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2800MHz | 2400MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L2 cache | - | - |
| L2 cache | - | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | - | - |
| Process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Transistor count | - | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Samsung Xclipse 920 | Adreno 642L |
| Architecture | RDNA 2 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 1300 MHz | 490 MHz |
| Pipelines | 24 | 2 |
| Shading units | 384 | 384 |
| Total shaders | 768 | 768 |
| FLOPS | - | 684 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 770 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | - | - |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | - | X53 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed 5G | Up to 7526 Mbps | Up to 3700 Mbps |
| Download speed 4G | Up to 3000 Mbps | Up to 1200 Mbps |
| Upload speed 5G | Up to 3758 Mbps | Up to 2900 Mbps |
| Upload speed 4G | Up to 422 Mbps | Up to 210 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | January 2022 | May 2021 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Model number | S5E9925 | SM7325 |
| Official page | Exynos 2200 official site | Snapdragon 778g official site |